|
Editorial |
The Little Engine
That Could |
Feb 2010 |
|
|
 
If the rumors were true, we're actually
glad Barbra said no to a three year deal on the Las Vegas Strip. But
if she wanted, Barbra, all by herself, could have been the engine that
kick-started that city's economy. |
|
|
|
|
The
Streisand Economic Effect
(Feb 11) - Earlier this week, you could almost hear a collective
groan around the city of Las Vegas. There were rumors that Barbra
Streisand had turned down an offer to perform on the Strip in a three
year concert engagement. Whether this rumor was true or not (we're
sure Barbra's been asked numerous times to perform as an artist-in
residence before), it's amazing to realize how she, alone, could have
a positive impact on an entire city's economy if she wanted.
Barbra performing on the Strip in a three year engagement would have
triggered a dramatic economic boom in a city that has taken a major
pounding during the recession. People from all over the world would
have flocked to Vegas for the next three years, courtesy of Barbra,
and the city would have benefited greatly by their patronage. Single-handedly, Barbra
could have been the engine that drove economic recovery, at least in
Vegas.
Bette Midler just concluded her two year run at Caesar's Palace, and
by all accounts, most of her performances were sell-outs. Cher has a
similar deal at the same hotel, and her success in bringing visitors
to Vegas is similarly documented. Celine Dion will return in 2011 for
her second three year stint, and if her first engagement is any
indication, she too will succeed. Each of these ladies did their part
in making a positive contribution to the economy on the Strip.
But if Barbra Streisand had agreed to a long term performance contract, the numbers would have been all the more impressive. Her
stature as THE preeminent performer in the world have eclipsed the
successes of Bette, Celine and Cher, combined. And the economic
kick-start Las Vegas so desperately needs would have been a godsend.
Having said that, we are actually glad that Barbra is not going to
enter into an extended run on the Strip. Barbra would have been an
employee of the hotel and subject to their restrictive rules.
Typically, any long-term Las Vegas production that is sponsored by one of these
large resorts is limited to 90 minutes with no intermission. Why?
Simple. In Las Vegas, it's gaming first, everything else (including
entertainment) second. The hotels want their guests in and out of the showrooms as
quickly as possible and back at the gaming tables. If Barbra were in
it for the money, she could have had a very lucrative pay day. But her
art would have been
restricted, and fortunately, we know that her art has always
transcended the opportunity for a quick and easy buck.
So what should Barbra do next as far as performing is concerned?
Ideally, we'd like to see Barbra commit to an extended run on
Broadway instead. Kick out "Mama Mia," reclaim residency at the Winter Garden
for six months or so, and show up on Tony night to pick up a real
Tony award - one for an actual performance.
And just imagine how positive the Streisand economic effect would be on the City
of New York.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|